Wednesday, 30 December 2009
When the star in the sky is gone,
When the Kings and Princes are home,
When the shepherds are back with their flocks,
The work of Christmas begins:
To find the lost
To heal the broken
To feed the hungry
To release the prisoner
To teach the nations
To bring Christ to all
To make music in the heart.
— Howard Thurman
Thurman had a great influence on Martin Luther King and this short reflection was read out close to the end of a midnight mass service which we attended this year. The extract below is from Thinking Anglicans,taken from a series of daily reflections which I hope will continue until Epiphany, and reminds us that Christmas is just a beginning, not an ending and in no way a sentimental story to be packed away with the nativity scene.
Within three days of the good news, comes the bad news. Yes, the Word has become flesh and is dwelling among us; but there seems to be a catch: the process of full redemption and recovery is to be accomplished within human beings, resistant materials that they are, step by step. As Robert Frost once observed ‘the best way out is always through’. Indeed the whole logic of incarnation is that God’s reaction to our evil is to meet it head on, not to steer round it. If this is the nature of the operation, the fullness of any redemption brought us in this holy child is bound to be a process that works from the inside out, needing to take flesh in real people through the seemingly random and cruel processes of the world, not a magic wand job.
Picture above is Breugel "The Census in Bethlehem" which I love for its sense of all the effort and chaos of human life and endeavour.
Thursday, 24 December 2009
Last time I checked he was in Russia, hope he doesn't drink all that vodka they've left for him!
Wednesday, 23 December 2009
Their old familiar carols play,
And wild and sweet
The words repeat
Of peace on earth, good will to men!
And thought how, as the day had come
The belfries of all Christendom
Had rolled along
The unbroken song
Of peace on earth, good will to men!
Till, ringing, singing on its way,
The world revolved from night to day,
A voice, a chime,
A chant sublime
Of peace on earth, good will to men!
Then from each black, accursed mouth
The cannon thundered in the South,
And with the sound
The carols drowned
Of peace on earth, good will to men!
It was as if an earthquake rent
The hearth-stones of a continent,
And made forlorn
The households born
Of peace on earth, good will to men!
And in despair I bowed my head;
"There is no peace on earth," I said;
"For hate is strong
And mocks the song
Of peace on earth, good will to men."
Then pealed the bells more loud and deep.
"God is not dead, nor doth he sleep!
The wrong shall fail,
The right prevail,
With peace on earth, good will to men!"
Longfellow wrote this poem in response to tragedy in his personal life. He had been filled with sorrow at the death of his wife in a fire in 1861. Two years later he heard that one of his sons had been seriously wounded in the Battle of the Potomac, where many young men tragically died, and on Christmas day he wrote this reflection on the Christmas message
Tuesday, 22 December 2009
Sometimes we all open our mouths and say the wrong thing , don’t we? I do have some sympathy with Father Tim Jones who says that some people shoplift out of desperation, undoubtedly he is a compassionate man and it may well be true that,
"Burglary causes untold harm and damage to people in a way that taking a can of spaghetti rings from a supermarket doesn't. “
However, as a general principle, it is probably best not to dig an even deeper hole by continuing,
“My advice, as a Christian priest, is to shoplift”, nor to go on and tell your congregation that it is preferable if it is a national business and that, “ I would ask that they do not steal from small family businesses” because it just starts to sound too much like advice and encouragement!
I wonder if the collection plate did the rounds and came back rather empty?
Monday, 21 December 2009
Seeker Of Truth by E. E. Cummings
seeker of truth
follow no path
all paths lead where
truth is here
Advent is about waiting but also about journeying and therefore about seeking, searching and wondering. Cumming’s poem, Seeker of Truth, is well suited to Advent because it raises so many questions. The first question the reader asks is, “Is this poem addressed to me - am I really a seeker of truth? Is every human being a seeker of truth? What is truth? How come I must “follow no path” when “all paths “ lead to truth? How can we lead to something that is already “here”? Do we limit truth by following defined “paths” anyhow? Why is the poem so short? Why does the grammar seem to break down at the end? Why is there no punctuation? Why is “truth here” and not somewhere else? Why does the poet tell us “truth is here” when he has told us no real “truth”?
I hope you don’t think I know the answers? That's not the point of this poem!
Saturday, 19 December 2009
I did say that conservatives would feel the Anglican Covenant lacks teeth and here is proof positive, Bishop Rodgers of the ACNA complains Williams views are "weak" and suggests the need for something "decisive" and "unambiguous" - but then anyone speaking for the ACNA would, wouldn't they?
See below for comment.
It is also worth reading this post by Colin Coward about the decision of the Joint Standing Committee, also announced yesterday, surely to coincide with the publication of the Covenant, concerning the actions of TEC in electing Mary Glasspool.
(You may notice that the afterglow of sherry and mince pies has now dissipated.)
Friday, 18 December 2009
I’ve had a quick read through and, no, it isn’t auspicious. Rowan Williams has written an accompanying commendation (now above) in which he tells us that this document is “not going to solve all our problems” (...you don’t say...) but hopes that it may provide a practical, sensible and Christian way of dealing with our conflicts ( I very much doubt it.)
I am not an expert on this matter, and it will be interesting to see the reactions and commentaries from those in the know ; for what it is worth, I personally suspect that this document will please nobody. Liberals will find it too confining and conservatives may feel it lacks disciplinary force – although those with enough wit may recognise that it goes as far down this road as is possible.
The first two sections are couched in very general terms, unfortunately within those generalisations there is plenty of scope for disagreement. Section 2.2.2, for example, commits each church to,
“ bring all to repentance and faith ”while not addressing the fact that some will call for repentance from liberal beliefs and “lifestyles” and some for repentance from homophobia and injustice.
Section three really begins the squeeze upon liberals and TEC in particular, committing all to “ seek a shared mind with other churches” and by (3.2.5)
“ to act with caution in respect of any action which may provoke controversy..or threaten the unity of the Communion”and ( 3.2.6) “in situations of conflict, to participate in mediated conversations...agreed parameters and a willingness to see such processes through.”This emphasis on not acting until there is a “shared mind” will not be acceptable to TEC, they are simply are not prepared to wait until places such as Uganda and Nigeria have reached the same understanding of human rights and dignity of LGBT people.
It is in Section four, of course, that the pressure to conform and the consequences of not acting in the light of shared discernment are outlined.There will be a Standing Committee and if anyone doesn’t do as it says they will be kicked out of the Covenant, or as the document more gracefully puts it,
(4.2.5) The Standing Committee may request a church to defer a controversial action. If a church declines ... the Standing Committee may recommend to any Instrument of Communion relational consequences which may specify... a suspension from that Instrument until the completion of the process set out below.”
There have been calls from conservatives for Section four to offer “discipline” and sanctions. It does not “discipline” as such but it is a charter to exclude and ostracise - is that really what a covenant should ultimately be about?
I do not think TEC will sign and as such Rowan’s two track Communion will be established. There will be first and second class members, the approved and “righteous” at the centre and the “sinful” , the transgressors, pushed to the margins. So much for the role of the Church in bringing about the Kingdom of God on Earth!
Thursday, 17 December 2009
Wisdom does not lie in dodging conflict, or trying to escape it. It lies in just how you confront it. Jesus does not confront conflict by blaming others. It is striking how rarely in the Gospels he ever blamed individuals. He blamed that which creates false barriers between people: the mix of closed minds, impossible purity standards and bumptious self satisfaction which has people hiding behind masks which disguise their inner failings, and their inner selves. Faced with individuals, typically he asked for hospitality, or offered forgiveness, without ever seeking an admission of guilt. So Jesus accepted Simon’s hospitality (Luke 7.36ff.). Simon failed to offer Jesus the usual courtesies, and Jesus made no accusation then. Later, he took an opportunity to comment on what actually happened.
Jesus’s very reaction to others sparked more anger and more controversy. In my experience, it still does. When we are hurt, or despised, we very naturally want to hit back, to prove our worth, and to point out the failings in our attacker. To be pulled up short in the enjoyable pursuit of seeing all the failings in the other is painful. Naturally we want to aggrandise our own virtues by contrasting them with their failings. To forgive, and to advocate forgiveness, is generally misunderstood. People think one is condoning the failing, or admitting one’s own guilt.
Naming sins, wrongs done to self or others, is healthy. It always needs to be balanced by an awareness of the humanity of the other and a lively sense of one’s own weaknesses. Otherwise one gets dragged into a spiral of accusation and counter accusation. You don’t even need to believe that Jesus is the wisdom of God to see how pointless that soon becomes.
Jesus avoided tit for tat, dodging it by wit, or evasive answers or silence. He did not do much spelling out of what is and is not the right moral code, and gave his followers few chances of scoring against others. He did not give simple, clear and easy to follow moral codes. He would not make his people into ‘the good guys’ and he would not turn any of the expected figures of hate into the bad guys. On the other hand, he was impossible to turn from what he believed to be true. He would not keep silent and he did not take a path which lead to appeasement. He kept right on speaking the truth. He had no discernable interest in keeping others on board, and less in keeping any faction of the Jewish faith together.
He saw the need of the people, and also their desire for him to be a leader and a ruler of a kind he had no intention of being, and he refused to fulfil it. He took his own chosen and principled path. That is how one acts out the Wisdom of God.
He sparked a huge anger, and a mix of disappointed hopes and unreal expectations. Mere common sense suggested his death, which was facilitated by one of his own followers whom he had failed to keep on board. O Wisdom. He died in agony.
Christian leaders would do well to bear all this in mind. Easy moral codes are not wisdom. Wisdom lies in taking a principled path, which does not blame others, but holds to what is true.
Monday, 14 December 2009
by Luci Shaw
Blue homespun and the bend of my breast
keep warm this small hot naked star
fallen to my arms. (Rest …
you who have had so far to come.)
Now nearness satisfies
the body of God sweetly. Quiet he lies
whose vigour hurled a universe. He sleeps
whose eyelids have not closed before.
His breath (so slight it seems
no breath at all) once ruffled the dark deeps
to sprout a world. Charmed by doves' voices,
the whisper of straw, he dreams,
hearing no music from his other spheres.
Breath, mouth, ears, eyes
he is curtailed who overflowed all skies,
all years. Older than eternity, now he
is new. Now native to earth as I am, nailed
to my poor planet, caught
that I might be free, blind in my womb
to know my darkness ended,
brought to this birth for me to be new-born,
and for him to see me mended
I must see him torn.
This poem by Luci Shaw imagines Mary’s wonderings. I particularly like the way this poem explores the paradox of might choosing vulnerability. As the poem progresses, the use of words such as “nailed”, “caught”, “brought to this” and “torn” hint at the suffering and pain of the crucifixion.
Sunday, 13 December 2009
Friday, 11 December 2009
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
Sunday, 6 December 2009
Saturday, 5 December 2009
I hope I don't start a new 100 years war by giving the Roman Catholic point of view on the different issues - and just when you were thinking that the Anglican Church was in need of some reforming! Church wise we are having an extraordinary time in Ireland after the publication of a report on the behaviour of the RC church and the authorities in dealing with claims of child abuse in the Dublin archdiocese. The RC archbishop of Dublin has said this week that he doesn't want to go in to a meeting with fellow bishops this week until they have answered for their behaviour in dealing with priests who were accused of abusing children. There are calls that at least one bishop should resign ... the Bishop of Limerick for "inexcusable behaviour" in not following up on claims of abuse in a thorough manner. The church in Ireland really has reached a turning point where the old ways will not be tolerated any more but the future remains unclear. It could be a catalyst for genuine reform or it may also result in many giving up on religion completely. The single point of hope is that the current Dublin archbishop has for the most part dealt in an honest fashion with what he has inherited, even to the point of standing up to the previous holder of the office, a cardinal and getting him to drop a legal action to maintain the secrecy of official documents. This archbishop says that there are now only two other bishops in the country who are on speaking terms with him!
I think it would be fair to say that the continued existence of the Catholic Church in Ireland rests in the hands of the archbishop of Dublin, without him the institution would have lost all credibility and the jury is still out on whether the institution can regain any credibility in the future.
Many of the abuse victims ... who are now in their fifties and sixties ... were incredibly brave people who have fought in some cases for a quarter of a century for their story to be heard. Apart from anything else, some were people of incredible faith and some have said the response of the bishops has been so poor that it has hurt them more than the original abuse (which in many cases was horrific.) The link to the latest official report is:
http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PB090005 04 or
a google for "catholic archdiocese Dublin report" will bring it up.
It’s over 700 pages long dealing with 46 sample cases in Dublin (how a sample of 46 accused priests were dealt with), in particular it shows how the authorities dealt with accusations of child abuse, previous reports dealt with the activities of the abusers, this one investigated into how a sample of them were dealt with.
A summary in paragraph 1.15 in part 1 states ...
"The Dublin Archdiocese's pre-occupations in dealing with cases of child sexual abuse, at least until the mid 1990s, were the maintenance of secrecy, the avoidance of scandal, the protection of the reputation of the Church, and the preservation of its assets. All other considerations, including the welfare of children and justice for victims, were subordinated to these priorities. The Archdiocese did not implement its own canon law rules and did its best to avoid any application of the law of the State."
It goes without saying that the behaviour of the church in the Dublin diocese was typical of the behaviour in dioceses countrywide. A TV current affairs program dealt with a case in Donegal where a priest was transferred to a new parish within the diocese every time accusations were made about him and there were about 10 transfers made over the course or 20 or 30 years leaving that individual free to repeatedly abuse over that period. We can't begin to grasp the evil inflicted on so many children’s lives by that one person. The Dublin report notes that one priest admitted to abusing over 100 children and another to abusing on a fortnightly basis during his 25 year ministry. But again not to lose sight of the fact that the scandal this time was the churches response and how it facilitated that abuse by the way it dealt with complaints and that the church was aware of what was happening but that its almost sole priority was protection of the institution and its assets, which meant that those who were abused were seen as the enemy and were treated as such rather than reaching out to try to heal their pain.
Finally it wasn't just the church, in many cases the authorities in the police ( the 'garda' ) and in the Dept of Justice were just as anxious to protect the church. Previous reports dealt with abuse by religious orders and the Dept of Education came out badly as well. The situation now is much better (it could hardly be worse) but there are many bishops still in office who were in positions of authority when these bad decisions were made. This report states that the current bishop of Limerick made bad decisions and on one occasion his behaviour was inexcusable. But he hasn't resigned ... presumably because he knows that just about every bishop in Ireland behaved the same way ... and thought they were right in so doing.
So where does that leave us, the people in the dock this time aren't the usual suspects but being Irish and living in Ireland I have to admit that the bishops response wasn't untypical. In Irish society in the past, those who made allegations of sexual abuse were regarded with deep suspicion and perhaps even hatred. It's uncomfortable to note too that in many other respects these bishops were 'good' people. In other areas they were kind, humane, affable, intelligent, educated people, some were regarded as capable theologians or were professors of sociology, they took great pains over moral issues and yet when confronted with the "worst crime" as it is described in Church law their behaviour directly allowed the sexual abuse of more and more children. Abuse is a mild term for the rape and horror those children went through ... in some cases over a period of many years.
So please God this may mark the beginning of the end of a bad era for the RC church in Ireland and the beginnings of a more humble church. The reform won't happen unless there is a large number of bishops resigning over the coming months otherwise the RC church in Ireland will be destroyed.
Thursday, 3 December 2009
The Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles elected the first female bishop in its 114-year history yesterday but ended voting for the day with one of two openly gay candidates still vying for the second bishop's position.
Rev. Diane M. Jardine Bruce, rector of St. Clement's-By-The-Sea Episcopal Church in San Clemente, was elected yesterday at the diocese's annual convention, but there is still a second post to fill and balloting will continue today.
This election is significant because two of the six candidates vying for the vacant positions are openly gay and, if you scroll down, you can read the thoughts of one of those involved in the selection process a few posts down.
Of the two gay candidates, one, the Rev. John L. Kirkley of San Francisco, withdrew late Friday. The other, the Rev. Mary D. Glasspool, of Baltimore, was one of the top two vote-getters in the first two rounds of balloting for the second position and is considered a favourite.
Last July, the Episcopal General Convention, the church's top policy-making body, voted to make the ordination process more “open” (resolution D025) and many saw this as paving the way for the election of another openly gay bishop in “defiance” of the moratorium following the election of Gene Robinson. Watch this space!
Tuesday, 1 December 2009
Sunday, 29 November 2009
WARNING……: ADVENT VIRUS
Be on the alert for symptoms of inner Hope, Peace, Joy and Love. The hearts of a great many have already been exposed to this virus and it is possible that people everywhere could come down with it in epidemic proportions. This could pose a serious threat to what has, up to now, been a fairly stable condition of conflict in the world.
Some signs and symptoms of The Advent Virus:
• A tendency to think and act spontaneously rather than on fears based on past experiences.
• An unmistakable ability to enjoy each moment.
• A loss of interest in judging other people.
• A loss of interest in interpreting the actions of others.
• A loss of interest in conflict.
• A loss of the ability to worry. (This is a very serious symptom.)
• Frequent, overwhelming episodes of appreciation.
• Contented feelings of connectedness with others and nature.
• Frequent attacks of smiling.
• An increasing tendency to let things happen rather than make them happen.
• An increased susceptibility to the love extended by others as well as the uncontrollable urge to extend it.
Please send this warning out to all your friends. This virus can and has affected many systems. Some systems have been completely cleaned out because of it.
I have to say that last year's calendar did provide some thought provoking and moving material, even if the title , "Why are we waiting?" is rather unfortunate if, like me, you are still asking yourself why we are waiting for a statement on the Ugandan bill...hmmmm, I so have to lose this bitterness...
Saturday, 28 November 2009
"In about a week the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles will gather in its annual convention to elect two suffragan bishops for the diocese. Among the six well qualified candidates are a partnered lesbian and a gay male priest married to his husband during the few months when it was legal for same sex couples to marry in California.
Imagine, if you will, what must be going through the minds of serious delegates and electors (I am one) as we approach this election, and as we view from here the events unfolding in Uganda and the Anglican Communion.
Who would hold back from voting for a well qualified lesbian or gay candidate whom she or he believes is the Holy Spirit's choice so as not to offend those who might otherwise leave the Episcopal Church for the Roman Catholic Church, or the Anglican Church in North America, or a conservative evangelical church?
What has happened to the cries of 'apostasy", "anything-goes morality", "abandonment of the faith once delivered to the saints", and "rejection of the plain truth of scripture", so loudly shouted at us by those who now make common cause with the Anglican Church of North America and Archbishop Orombi? These are the persons who told us, unctuously, of their love for LGBT persons and of Jesus' desire to "heal" them through organizations that we now know advocate for the imprisonment and execution of LGBT persons.
Shall we continue to observe a "moratorium" on the consecration of partnered gay persons to the episcopacy - a moratorium demanded at Dar Es Salaam by prelates who are now thunderously silent or supportive, as a government in a nation with a large Anglican Church plans to open a pogrom against LGBT persons?
Shall we defer out of respect for and desire to be in "first tier" communion with the Archbishop of Canterbury, who had no hesitation in flying to Canada in 2008 to make clear to the Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada the consequences should they vote to bless same sex unions and who had the temerity to open his sermon at the General Convention of TEC in 2009 with a very clear reference as to how he would like us to vote on resolutions before us - but who is now eerily silent about the actions of the Church of Uganda? For me, this person's excuses for public silence take from him the moral authority that I would wish he had.
Perhaps we should refrain from voting for the Holy Spirit's choice for bishop, should that be a gay person, out of deference to our "ecumenical partners", especially the Roman Catholic Church, which has shown such deference to us and whose pope is equally silent about the proposed murderous attack on LGBT persons in Uganda.
I don't know how the Holy Spirit will lead us in Riverside California a week from now. I do know that most of us will listen far more to her than to the blandishments of those whose views and inaction demonstrate a lack of common human decency that is stunning."
TEC has been here before, in 2006 I believe, when, if I remember correctly, they refrained from electing a gay candidate, it will be interesting to see what they do next month.
Thursday, 26 November 2009
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
The signature Jedward hairstyle really doesn't do anything for Brown and Cameron, does it? At the same time I am not convinced that any doctoring of their image could make them any lower in my esteem than they already are. It won't be the X factor , but there will be a showdown and grand vote before June 2010 - now, where is that red button?
Sunday, 22 November 2009
I recently blogged on the Lord's ruling that upheld the religious exemption clause introduced by Lord Waddington (12th November) which gave an indication of the controversy that the Equality legislation has generated. I am not going to comment here, but it will be interesting to see the various reaction of interested parties both outside and within the Church.
Saturday, 21 November 2009
Martin Luther believed dogs have souls and he had some spot on ideas, didn't he? One thing is definite, dogs are capable of prayer. Look at the look of supplication in this Westie’s eyes and tell me that this is not true ...see, you can’t, can you?
Monday, 16 November 2009
Fortunately for anyone currently feeling bitter, marginalised or beleagured, ASBO Jesus also had this message for us:
Which leads to the faint possibility that we can sometimes feel like this:
Even if it is, at times, a remarkably well kept secret...
I actually feel too stunned to comment on this, except to say that it looks a lot like walking by on the other side of the road.
Saturday, 14 November 2009
Thursday, 12 November 2009
Now, I have blogged on this subject at length (Offend or please, 18th September) and do not intend to reiterate my points. It is clearly insupportable that anyone should be breaking the law by simply expressing a view that homosexual practice is wrong. It is also insupportable that they should cause distress or harassment to others by expressing those views in a way that is intrusive, unsolicited or liable to incite hatred or acts of discrimination by others. I have not looked at the wording of the clause, if it focuses on concepts such as “reasonableness” and “context”, I would probably support it; if it is simply a blanket exemption, I would not. It is also worth noting though that the legislation, as supported by the Commons, would have been extremely unlikely to have led to action against anyone on the grounds that they expressed a simple opinion,
“ A spokeswoman said the government was “very disappointed” at the vote as the threshold for prosecution was “high”, the defence was not needed . She said “The offence only covers words or behaviour that are threatening and intended to stir up hatred.”
There is no doubt that there is genuine concern around the equality legislation and that that concern comes from groups as diverse as Churches and comedians. What does worry me is that a small number of those who support the “free speech” clause do so because it allows them to offer “reparative therapies” ; therapies which have been shown to be deeply damaging to the psychological well being of the individuals involved. There are ex gay industries in the UK and I would like to see such “ministries” answerable to outside bodies in terms of their ethical frameworks and open to litigation if they operate in ways that could be deemed detrimental to the individuals involved.
Meanwhile, as some sectors of the Church celebrate their freedom of speech, a climate of fear and an inability to speak out still remains for so many LGBT Christians. Clergy whose love literally “dare not speak its name” , a “don’t ask” but also a “don’t you dare tell” policy and laypeople who are silent or invisible in the face of a Church which claims to be committed to a listening process but is in the process of firmly stopping its ears.
Photo above : Conservative christians at this year's Manchester Gay Pride
I've only had a brief scan of it this morning and may say more later , both on this and on the Lord's rejection of the homophobia clause relating to freedom of speech.
Sunday, 8 November 2009
The great ones of the earth,
Approve, with smiles and bland salutes, the rage
And monstrous tyranny they have brought to birth.
The great ones of the earth
Are much concerned about the wars they wage,
And quite aware of what those wars are worth.
* * *
You Marshals, gilt and red,
You Ministers and Princes, and Great Men,
Why can’t you keep your mouthings for the dead?
Go round the simple Cemeteries; and then
Talk of our noble sacrifice and losses
To the wooden crosses.
Siegfried Sassoon, WW1 Officer and Poet
Sassoon's bitter but moving poem, "Great Men", sums up so much of what I feel at this time of year. I have mixed feeling about Remembrance Sunday, perhaps because of memories of the day having such a high profile when I was growing up ( my dad was a British Forces Padre stationed in a military garrison in Germany.) I am far from being a pacifist but I have deep reservations about so many recent conflicts, in particular the war with Iraq and the current conflict in Afghanistan.
Sassoon has little time in this poem for posturing or war mongering and knew from his own experiences that those in power can be willing to sacrifice lives for political expediency. You can hear his bitter contempt for the "Marshalls, gilt and red", a reference to the uniforms but also the literal "guilt" and red of the blood on their hands. Yet this poem moves from anger to pity, profound respect and his sense of solidarity with the common soldier. His tribute to the true "great men", the unacknowledged soldiers who lie in "simple" cemeteries with only "wooden crosses", is very moving and, to me, is what any act of remembrance should be about.
Thursday, 5 November 2009
Tuesday, 3 November 2009
CA and IC have approached Fulcrum, Anglican Mainstream and other groups or parties to ask them to “set aside our differences” in sending a joint letter condemning such violence and discrimination. The silence so far has been deafening and the only stated basis I can find for their refusal is that Colin Coward is apparently “selectively quoting” Lambeth 1998 resolutions.
It does seem that, despite the claims to deplore violence and hatred, certain factions are unwilling to put aside petty dislikes. I find our inability to work together dispiriting, but equally depressing is the resounding silence of Canterbury and York. The silence here is likely to arise from other causes than animosity to “sinfulness” – fear perhaps? caution? weariness? indifference?
Savi Henderson wrote eloquently recently about how the Church of sixty years ago was a force for justice in our world,
"Sixty years ago the Anglican Communion was at the forefront of human rights. Though commitment to rights for all has been repeatedly endorsed, it now tends to be referred to in vague terms by top leaders. They will have to decide how to respond to this legislation... What they do or fail to do, will affect their ability to witness to a God who does not abandon the abused and exploited. These are testing times.”
Regardless of our differences - what price courage, integrity, sacrifice, optimism, love - in the place of expediency and vested interests? As Henderson implies, we might as well go back to flower arranging.
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
We then headed up to the Whitewater Hotel in Newby Bridge. You can see from the pictures that it is aptly named, because the river at the back forms quite a torrent as it courses over the rocks under the bridge.
Sunday, 25 October 2009
“ Both John Broadhurst and John Hind and the flying bishops of Ebbsfleet and Richborough know that they pastor many gay male Anglican-Catholic priests.”
Quite a lot of naming and shaming in Coward’s article, I get the feeling that someone who knows most of what there is to know about various people in the C of E is itching to name more than a few home truths...
Meanwhile, some have suggested that Rome has not exactly been above board in wooing those ready to jump ship. Lord Carey has been reported by Ruth Gledhill as “appalled” by the apparent contempt shown by Rome in failing to consult the Archbishop of Canterbury and notifying him only a few weeks in advance.
My personal view, and many may disagree with me, is that Rowan Williams has been treated appallingly by many within and outside Anglicanism. Kendal Harmon (Titus online, courtesy of Anglican Mainstream) has displayed his contempt for what he sees as William’s laxity and lack of authority by describing Rome’s offer as,
“ a huge indictment of the leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury.”
Many conservative commentators have used the Vatican’s announcement to put the knife in, describing Williams as, “taken by surprise”, “ignored” and “completely unaware” and many web sites have clearly selected the most unflattering photos, such as the ones featured here. There are also clear signs that many liberal commentators are not so sweet on Williams. The MCPU’s recent response to his actions over Anaheim was tantamount to an accusation that he lacks the integrity to be true to his convictions or to make clear to others the limits of what he is and is not willing - or indeed able -to do.
While I do not believe Williams is, or should be, above all criticism, I think the level of carping in some quarters lacks generosity. He is not someone who sees his role as to police the various squabbles in Anglicanism but primarily as a spiritual leader. Grace and forbearance with each other are the Christian virtues that he has offered as a means to unity, but his recent comments about a “two track” Communion do show that he is realistic enough to know that, for the time being at least, we may need to live separate lives.
Saturday, 24 October 2009
Within minutes of watching Griffin perform, I felt a lot easier. It didn't take long to recognise that this was not going to be a slick performance as he blundered his way through the programme alternating from arrogant buffoonery to self pitying ingratiation. It was, as they say, not a pretty sight - but at least he created some near comedy (if it hadn't been so offensive) with his non violent Ku Klux Klan and the assertion that he only associated with fascists to moderate their views.
And yet ... on Radio 4 on Thursday morning they discussed the turning point in the political career of Jean -Marie Le Pen, when in 1984 a similar exposure in the media dramatically increased his foothold in French society. Over the last few decades we have seen a sea change in attitudes towards people based on gender and sexual orientation; racial prejudice has not decreased in the same way - and anti Islamic feeling has burgeoned. I just hope and pray that, when it comes to the BNP, history won't repeat itself.